‘Someone wanted him gone’: Michael Vaughan makes stunning claim about Ben Stokes’s England captaincy and ECB fallout originally appeared on Cricket News.
Add Cricket News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- Michael Vaughan alleges in a Telegraph column that someone in the ECB hierarchy wanted Ben Stokes gone as captain.
- The former England captain argues trust between Stokes and the ECB can never fully recover after the saga.
- Vaughan questions England’s direction, noting they have won just two of their last nine Tests.
Michael Vaughan makes stunning claim about Ben Stokes’s England captaincy and ECB fallout
Michael Vaughan has alleged that figures within the England and Wales Cricket Board wanted Ben Stokes removed as captain in the wake of the Chelsea nightclub incident, a claim that sits at the heart of a scathing column the Ashes-winning former captain wrote for The Telegraph. According to Vaughan, that alleged desire to push Stokes out has permanently fractured the relationship between the captain and his board.
Stokes will return to lead England in the third Test against New Zealand at Trent Bridge from Thursday, following his omission from the Oval defeat. While Vaughan welcomed the captain’s return in his Telegraph piece, he argued the fallout has left scars that cannot heal simply because Stokes is back in the side.
The central thrust of Vaughan’s column is the question of who allegedly moved against Stokes and whether the all-rounder can ever trust them again. He framed any such attempt as extraordinary given Stokes’ standing in the English game, and built his entire argument around the damage that decision has reportedly done.
More: Cricket world reacts to Henry’s 10-wicket Test haul as NZ beat ENG in 2nd Test
Vaughan alleges a move against Stokes
Writing in The Telegraph, Vaughan claimed the messaging emerging from the ECB in the days after the incident pointed clearly towards an attempt to remove Stokes from the captaincy. He suggested this was an astonishing position to take against one of the country’s finest players.
“This is not any old cricketer we are talking about. It is Ben Stokes, one of our greatest ever, who has given so much for the shirt. Whoever those people are, how can they possibly work with Stokes again? How can he trust them?” Vaughan wrote in his Telegraph column.
He also took aim at head coach Brendon McCullum and director of cricket Rob Key, expressing surprise in the same column at how downbeat they were and their failure to publicly back Stokes while he was left out of the side.
More: India squad for England ODI series 2026: Full team list
McCullum addresses the curfew ambiguity
McCullum himself has acknowledged the curfew may not have been spelled out as clearly as it should have been, an admission that lends weight to Vaughan’s claim that attention to detail has been lacking. The head coach, however, insisted that international cricketers should not need a written rulebook to understand their responsibilities.
“Yeah, even if there is ambiguity, I struggled to say that word, even if there is. I think we’ve, I mean, we’ve sat here and talked about the curfew. We’ve talked about standards. We’ve talked about many things that we want to be known for as the cricket team,” McCullum said.
“There may not have been a hard blueprint” 💬
— Brendon McCullum answers questions on England’s curfew protocols. pic.twitter.com/opFnC8bIeC
— The Cricketer (@TheCricketerMag) June 21, 2026
The head coach stressed that representing England carries obligations beyond the individual, a pointed reminder aimed at players whose conduct has repeatedly landed the team in off-field controversy over recent months. His emphasis on standards reads as both a defense of the ECB’s position and a quiet rebuke.
More: Will Ben Stokes play in ENG vs NZ 3rd Test?
What it means: A crisis created out of a drama
Vaughan argued in The Telegraph that the ECB compounded the problem by moving too slowly and hiding behind bureaucratic processes. He contrasted Stokes missing a Test with the treatment of Harry Brook, who he noted was fined but never missed any cricket after his own incident in Wellington.
“It has created a crisis out of a drama. It does strike me that English cricket handles a little bit of drama so badly,” Vaughan wrote, pointing to the cricket regulator’s involvement as an unnecessary layer of red tape that left too much open to outside noise.
Beyond the immediate controversy, Vaughan used his Telegraph column to raise broader concerns about the direction of English cricket. He noted the regime had failed to win any of its first four five-match series and that England have won just two of their last nine Tests, questioning whether the management is genuinely improving the team.
With Stokes back and so much on the line, Vaughan framed the Trent Bridge decider as an enormous occasion, noting England rarely lose Test series at home. He promised in the column to watch the key relationships within the camp closely, having argued they will inevitably become strained after a fortnight of turmoil.
For all the latest cricket news, opinion, and commentary and to share your voice, head to our Facebook, Instagram, and X (Twitter) pages.
About the Author
