A Russian national known in Ukraine as volunteer Aslan Khakimov is in fact Ruslan Puptaiev, a man who entered Ukraine illegally, lived for more than a decade under false documents, and is wanted by Interpol at Russia’s request, according to an investigation by Babel.
The case has become one of Ukraine’s most closely watched deportation disputes, drawing support from soldiers, volunteers, human rights advocates, and lawmakers. Backers argue Puptaiev’s contributions to Ukraine’s defense and the risk of torture if returned to Russia should outweigh his immigration violations, while Ukrainian authorities maintain he lived in the country illegally under forged documents.
According to the investigation, Ukraine’s State Migration Service cancelled the documents issued under the false identity in October 2025. After Puptaiev failed to regularize his legal status or challenge the decision, the agency ordered his forced deportation in April 2026. He has since been held at a temporary detention facility for foreigners in Lutsk while legal proceedings continue.
Claims of persecution in Russia
Puptaiev told Babel he fled Russia in 2015 after allegedly being detained and tortured by Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), which he says accused him of Islamist extremism following his conversion to Islam while serving a prison sentence.
He says he entered Ukraine illegally because he feared seeking legal protection would expose him to extradition. Rather than applying for refugee status or other international protection, he instead acquired forged Ukrainian identity documents under the name Aslan Khakimov and later used them to obtain genuine state-issued documents based on the false identity, Babel reports.
Over the following years, he established businesses, married Ukrainian citizens, and registered his children using the fabricated identity.
Volunteer work after Russia’s full-scale invasion
Babel reports that Puptaiev became involved in supporting Ukraine’s military after Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022.
After Russia’s full-scale invasion, Puptaiev supported Ukraine’s military by donating money, developing equipment including unmanned ground vehicle components and airless evacuation wheels, and training dozens of service members, according to Babel.
Babel reports he has received letters of appreciation from Ukraine’s military intelligence agency (HUR), Special Operations Forces, Armed Forces, Ministry of Defense, and individual units recognizing his volunteer work.
His public appeals for support began only after he was detained in April 2026, with supporters portraying the case as an attempt by Ukraine to extradite a volunteer to Russia.
Interpol notice and Russian conviction
According to Babel, Ukraine’s National Police confirmed that Puptaiev is the subject of an Interpol notice requested by Russia.
Russian authorities accuse him of financing terrorism and maintaining links to the Islamic State group. Babel notes that Russian media reported he was convicted in absentia by a Russian military court in 2024 and sentenced to 20 years in prison on terrorism-related charges.
Puptaiev denies Russia’s allegations and maintains that he is being politically persecuted.
ECHR blocks deportation to Russia
Puptaiev’s lawyers say Ukraine’s original deportation order referred only to his “country of origin” – Russia. After his legal team appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the court issued interim measures under Rule 39 on 26 May, temporarily barring Ukraine from returning him to Russia while it considers the case.
Human rights experts told Babel that Rule 39 is reserved for exceptional cases where there is a credible risk of irreparable harm, including torture or threats to life. They said the measure does not determine the outcome of the case but requires Ukraine to avoid returning Puptaiev to Russia while proceedings continue.
Babel reports that Ukrainian authorities are also exploring whether Puptaiev could instead be deported to Kyrgyzstan, where he was born, or Türkiye. His lawyers argue that either country could ultimately extradite him to Russia, exposing him to the same risks the ECHR sought to prevent.
The ECHR case remains pending.
About the Author
